We propose ImitSA T, a branching policy for conflict-driven clause learning (CDCL) solvers based on imitation learning for the Boolean satisfiability problem (SA T). Unlike previous methods that predict instance-level signals to improve CDCL branching indirectly, or rely on reinforcement learning and insufficient CDCL information to enhance branching, ImitSA T learns from expert KeyTrace that collapses a full run into the sequence of surviving decisions. Replaying a KeyTrace on the same instance is nearly conflict-free, providing dense decision-level supervision and directly reducing propagations--the dominant contributor to wall-clock time. This prefix-conditioned supervision enables ImitSA T to reproduce high-quality branches without exploration, yielding faster convergence, stable training, and seamless integration into CDCL. Extensive experiments demonstrate that ImitSA T reduces propagation counts and runtime, outperforming state-of-the-art learned approaches. The Boolean satisfiability (SA T) problem is a cornerstone of theoretical computer science and artificial intelligence (Cook, 1971; Karp, 1972). Beyond its foundational role, SA T serves as the computational backbone of numerous applications, including formal verification, planning, and combinatorial optimization. Modern solvers for SA T are dominated by the conflict-driven clause learning (CDCL) framework (Silva & Sakallah, 1996; Biere et al., 2009), which has scaled to industrial benchmarks of immense complexity. A CDCL run interleaves branching, unit propagation, and conflict analysis. Among these components, the branching rule largely determines the search trajectory, while unit propagation often dominates runtime (Zhang & Malik, 2002; Davis et al., 2008; Moskewicz et al., 2001). As a result, more informed branching decisions can translate directly into faster solving.

Answer Set Programming (ASP) provides a powerful declarative paradigm for knowledge representation and reasoning. Recently, counting answer sets has emerged as an important computational problem with applications in probabilistic reasoning, network reliability analysis, and other domains. This has motivated significant research into designing efficient ASP counters. While substantial progress has been made for normal logic programs, the development of practical counters for disjunctive logic programs remains challenging. We present SharpASP-SR, a novel framework for counting answer sets of disjunctive logic programs based on subtractive reduction to projected propositional model counting. Our approach introduces an alternative characterization of answer sets that enables efficient reduction while ensuring that intermediate representations remain of polynomial size. This allows SharpASP-SR to leverage recent advances in projected model counting technology. Through extensive experimental evaluation on diverse benchmarks, we demonstrate that SharpASP-SR significantly outperforms existing counters on instances with large answer set counts. Building on these results, we develop a hybrid counting approach that combines enumeration techniques with SharpASP-SR to achieve state-of-the-art performance across the full spectrum of disjunctive programs.

The Logic-Constrained Shortest Path Problem (LCSP) combines a one-to-one shortest path problem with satisfiability constraints imposed on the routing graph. This setting arises in flight planning, where air traffic control (ATC) authorities are enforcing a set of traffic flow restrictions (TFRs) on aircraft routes in order to increase safety and throughput. We propose a new branch and bound-based algorithm for the LCSP. The resulting algorithm has three main degrees of freedom: the node selection rule, the branching rule and the conflict. While node selection and branching rules have been long studied in the MIP and SAT communities, most of them cannot be applied out of the box for the LCSP. We review the existing literature and develop tailored variants of the most prominent rules. The conflict, the set of variables to which the branching rule is applied, is unique to the LCSP. We analyze its theoretical impact on the B&B algorithm. In the second part of the paper, we show how to model the Flight Planning Problem with TFRs as an LCSP and solve it using the branch and bound algorithm. We demonstrate the algorithm's efficiency on a dataset consisting of a global flight graph and a set of around 20000 real TFRs obtained from our industry partner Lufthansa Systems GmbH. We make this dataset publicly available. Finally, we conduct an empirical in-depth analysis of node selection rules, branching rules and conflicts. Carefully choosing an appropriate combination yields an improvement of an order of magnitude compared to an uninformed choice.

A PARAT "program" is basically a sequence of array operations over SOps. Throughout this section, we refer to the indices along the first dimension of an SOp as "position" and refer to indices along the second dimension as "dimension". The "inputs" to a program are arbitrary positional encoding and token embedding SOps, represented by the base class names PosEncSOp and TokEmbSOp respectively. For example, the OneHotTokEmb class represents the one-hot embedding of tokens and Indices represents the numerical value of the index of each position. The rest of the program performs various operations that compute new SOps based on existing ones. We provide implementations of basic building block operations including (but not limited to) the following: Mean(q, k, v) Represents the "Averaging Hard Attention" operation.

Answer Set Programming (ASP) has emerged as a promising paradigm in knowledge representation and automated reasoning owing to its ability to model hard combinatorial problems from diverse domains in a natural way. Building on advances in propositional SAT solving, the past two decades have witnessed the emergence of well-engineered systems for solving the answer set satisfiability problem, i.e., finding models or answer sets for a given answer set program. In recent years, there has been growing interest in problems beyond satisfiability, such as model counting, in the context of ASP. Akin to the early days of propositional model counting, state-of-the-art exact answer set counters do not scale well beyond small instances. Exact ASP counters struggle with handling larger input formulas. The primary contribution of this paper is a new ASP counting framework, called sharpASP, which counts answer sets avoiding larger input formulas. This relies on an alternative way of defining answer sets that allows for the lifting of key techniques developed in the context of propositional model counting. Our extensive empirical analysis over 1470 benchmarks demonstrates significant performance gain over current state-of-the-art exact answer set counters. Specifically, by using sharpASP, we were able to solve 1062 benchmarks with PAR2 score of 3082 whereas using prior state-of-the-art, we could only solve 895 benchmarks with a PAR2 score of 4205, all other experimental conditions being the same.

In the article, within the framework of the Boolean Satisfiability problem (SAT), the problem of estimating the hardness of specific Boolean formulas w.r.t. a specific complete SAT solving algorithm is considered. Based on the well-known Strong Backdoor Set (SBS) concept, we introduce the notion of decomposition hardness (d-hardness). If $B$ is an arbitrary subset of the set of variables occurring in a SAT formula $C$, and $A$ is an arbitrary complete SAT solver , then the d-hardness expresses an estimate of the hardness of $C$ w.r.t. $A$ and $B$. We show that the d-hardness of $C$ w.r.t. a particular $B$ can be expressed in terms of the expected value of a special random variable associated with $A$, $B$, and $C$. For its computational evaluation, algorithms based on the Monte Carlo method can be used. The problem of finding $B$ with the minimum value of d-hardness is formulated as an optimization problem for a pseudo-Boolean function whose values are calculated as a result of a probabilistic experiment. To minimize this function, we use evolutionary algorithms. In the experimental part, we demonstrate the applicability of the concept of d-hardness and the methods of its estimation to solving hard unsatisfiable SAT instances.

Local search is an effective method for solving large-scale combinatorial optimization problems, and it has made remarkable progress in recent years through several subtle mechanisms. In this paper, we found two ways to improve the local search algorithms in solving Pseudo-Boolean Optimization (PBO): Firstly, some of those mechanisms such as unit propagation are merely used in solving MaxSAT before, which can be generalized to solve PBO as well; Secondly, the existing local search algorithms utilize the heuristic on variables, so-called score, to mainly guide the search. We attempt to gain more insights into the clause, as it plays the role of a middleman who builds a bridge between variables and the given formula. Hence, we first extended the combination of unit propagation-based decimation algorithm to PBO problem, giving a further generalized definition of unit clause for PBO problem, and apply it to the existing solver LS-PBO for constructing an initial assignment; then, we introduced a new heuristic on clauses, dubbed care, to set a higher priority for the clauses that are less satisfied in current iterations. Experiments on benchmarks from the most recent PB Competition, as well as three real-world application benchmarks including minimum-width confidence band, wireless sensor network optimization, and seating arrangement problems show that our algorithm DeciLS-PBO has a promising performance compared to the state-of-the-art algorithms.

In this paper, we investigate CNF encodings, for which unit propagation is strong enough to derive a contradiction if the encoding is not consistent with a partial assignment of the variables (unit refutation complete or URC encoding) or additionally to derive all implied literals if the encoding is consistent with the partial assignment (propagation complete or PC encoding). We prove an exponential separation between the sizes of PC and URC encodings without auxiliary variables and strengthen the known results on their relationship to the PC and URC encodings that can use auxiliary variables. Besides of this, we prove that the sizes of any two irredundant PC formulas representing the same function differ at most by a factor polynomial in the number of the variables and present an example of a function demonstrating that a similar statement is not true for URC formulas. One of the separations above implies that a q-Horn formula may require an exponential number of additional clauses to become a URC formula. On the other hand, for every q-Horn formula, we present a polynomial size URC encoding of the same function using auxiliary variables. This encoding is not q-Horn in general.

We describe a SAT solver using both the GPU (CUDA) and the CPU with a new clause exchange strategy. The CPU runs a classic multithreaded CDCL SAT solver. EachCPU thread exports all the clauses it learns to the GPU. The GPU makes a heavy usage of bitwise operations. It notices when a clause would have been used by a CPU thread and notifies that thread, in which case it imports that clause. This relies on the GPU repeatedly testing millions of clauses against hundreds of assignments. All the clauses are tested independantly from each other (which allows the GPU massively parallel approach), but against all the assignments at once, using bitwise operations. This allows CPU threads to only import clauses which would have been useful for them. Our solver is based upon glucose-syrup. Experiments show that this leads to a strong performance improvement, with 22 more instances solved on the SAT 2020 competition than glucose-syrup.

Modern SAT solvers routinely operate at scales that make it impractical to query a neural network for every branching decision. NeuroCore, proposed by Selsam and Bjorner, offered a proof-of-concept that neural networks can still accelerate SAT solvers by only periodically refocusing a score-based branching heuristic. However, that work suffered from several limitations: their modified solvers require GPU acceleration, further ablations showed that they were no better than a random baseline on the SATCOMP 2018 benchmark, and their training target of unsat cores required an expensive data pipeline which only labels relatively easy unsatisfiable problems. We address all these limitations, using a simpler network architecture allowing CPU inference for even large industrial problems with millions of clauses, and training instead to predict {\em glue variables}---a target for which it is easier to generate labelled data, and which can also be formulated as a reinforcement learning task. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach by modifying the state-of-the-art SAT solver CaDiCaL, improving its performance on SATCOMP 2018 and SATRACE 2019 with supervised learning and its performance on a dataset of SHA-1 preimage attacks with reinforcement learning.